MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377989932 · doi:10.1021/accountsmr.3c00012

Advanced Nanomaterials and Characterization Techniques for Photovoltaic and Photocatalysis Applications

2023· article· en· W4377989932 on OpenAlexafffund
Ting Yu, Wanting He, Qingzhe Zhang, Dongling Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Materials Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesShandong University of TechnologyTaishan Scholar Project of Shandong ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPhotocatalysisNanomaterialsCharacterization (materials science)Photovoltaic systemNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringCatalysisElectrical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conspectus Solar energy is one of the most promising energy sources to replace traditional fossil fuels due to its renewable and green features, which can be converted to electrical and chemical energy through photon-enabled applications. To improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy, solar energy “converters”, such as photovoltaic and photocatalytic systems, have been extensively studied. It is noteworthy that the common issues of narrow optical absorption and rapid charge carrier recombination limit solar energy utilization. The development of advanced functional nanomaterials plays a decisive role in addressing these issues. For instance, plasmonic nanomaterials with a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect can effectively extend and enhance light absorption; heterojunction- and homojunction-based semiconductors can facilitate the spatial separation of electron–hole pairs. Therefore, rational design of functional nanomaterials through integrating plasmonic nanomaterials and creating heterojunctions and homojunctions can amplify their structural advantages, leading to the achievement of the state-of-the-art photon-conversion performance. Besides, the in-depth understanding of the relationship between materials and performance via advanced characterization techniques, such as high spatial-resolution imaging and in situ spectroscopy, provides a fundamental and solid basis for optimizing advanced functional materials in photon-enabled applications. Along with theoretical calculation and algorithm-driven data analysis during advanced characterizations, more quantified information can be obtained for deeper insights into physics. In this Account, we first summarize recent works in our research group on the rational design of advanced functional materials, including plasmonic metallic materials, plasmonic semiconductors, two-dimensional-material-based heterojunctions, and metal–organic-framework-based homojunctions, and their working mechanisms for the enhancement of photovoltaic and photocatalytic performance. We then show how we employed developed X-ray-based, electron-based, and spectroscopic techniques for characterizing elemental composition, materials structure, and physicochemical properties, which provides effective ways to resolve complex structures and processes and understand their underlying physics. Furthermore, we discuss the photogenerated charge carrier dynamics in solar cells and photocatalysis using in situ and time-resolved techniques, by underlining the use of these advanced techniques for specific materials. Then, we briefly introduce the algorithm-driven data analysis compiled in analytical techniques in our works to quantify materials information. Finally, we briefly present perspectives for addressing the challenges and fundamental issues as well as guidance for the future development of photon-enabled applications, e.g., the development of high-performance functional materials and advanced characterization techniques. This Account shows some ideas and directions for the rational design and optimization of advanced functional materials for various photon-enabled applications and for the proper utilization of advanced characterization techniques, which may provide guidance and prospects for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Materials ResearchSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207