MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377992013 · doi:10.4000/ries.13555

L’expérience du handicap à l’école

2023· paratext· fr· W4377992013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2023
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’expérience du handicap à l’école a été marquée par une série de paradoxes et de tensions au cours des dernières décennies. Comment varie-t-elle en fonction du type de handicap, des contextes socio-culturels nationaux et du fait de l’ignorance collective ? Comment les pratiques effectives mises en place par les écoles, les familles et d’autres partenaires peuvent-elles faire évoluer les objectifs d’intégration scolaire et d’inclusion sociale ? Quel vocabulaire utiliser ? Que prévoir, en termes de dispositions à prendre et d’accompagnement des acteurs impliqués ? Les articles ici réunis proposent d’examiner les politiques éducatives et les pratiques des enseignants, des acteurs et des professionnels dans huit systèmes éducatifs, répartis sur quatre continents : la Bulgarie, le Canada, la République démocratique du Congo, l’Italie, la France, le Japon, le Mexique et la Zambie. Le choix de ces contextes différents, auquel s’ajoutent un entretien avec l’une des responsables de l’ONG Handicap International et une bibliographie, a été guidé par la volonté de contribuer à la réflexion sur les soutiens effectifs et différenciés offerts aux élèves vivant avec un handicap. Le chemin à parcourir pour rendre positive l’expérience de scolarisation des enfants et des jeunes handicapés reste semé d’embûches multiples dans de nombreux pays. Tous les auteurs s’accordent à souligner l’importance de l’attention portée à l’environnement socio-éducatif, qui rend possible ou non la réalisation du potentiel de chaque enfant. The experience of disability in schools has been marked by a series of paradoxes and tensions over the past few decades. How does it vary according to the type of disability or national and sociocultural contexts? How does it fare in the face of collective ignorance? How can the actual practices implemented by schools, families and other partners promote objectives of integration at school and social inclusion? What language should be used? What to expect, in terms of practical arrangements and forms of support for the actors involved? The articles in this special issue set out to examine education policies and the practices of teachers, stakeholders and professionals in eight education systems spread over four continents: Bulgaria, Canada, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Italy, France, Japan, Mexico and Zambia. These different case studies, alongside an interview with a leader of Humanity & Inclusion NGO (formerly Handicap International) and a bibliography, were chosen with a view to contribute to our thinking about what effective and tailored forms of support can be offered to students living with a disability. Making schooling a positive experience for children and young people with disabilities is still a bumpy road in many contexts. All the authors in the dossier draw our attention to the importance of the socio-educational environment, which makes it possible or not for each child to reach their potential. La experiencia de la discapacidad en la escuela ha sido marcada por una serie de paradojas y de tensiones a lo largo de estas últimas décadas. ¿Cómo cambia en función del tipo de discapacidad, de los contextos socioculturales nacionales y de la ignorancia colectiva? ¿Cómo las prácticas efectivas instauradas por las escuelas, las familias y los demás actores involucrados pueden hacer evolucionar los objetivos de integración escolar y de inclusión social? ¿Qué vocabulario conviene utilizar? ¿Qué es lo que se puede prever en materia de dispositivos que cabe adoptar y de acompañamiento de los actores implicados? Los artículos aquíreunidos se proponen examinar las prácticas de los docentes, de los actores y de los profesionales en ocho sistemas educativos repartidos en cuatro continentes: Bulgaria, Canadá, República democrática de Congo, Italia, Francia, Japón, México y Zambia. La elección de estos diferentes contextos, a los que se añade una entrevista con una de las responsables de la ONG Handicap International y una bibliografía, ha sido guiada por la voluntad de contribuir a la reflexión sobre los apoyos efectivos y diferenciados ofrecidos a los alumnos que viven con una discapacidad. El camino que queda por hacer para hacer que la experiencia de escolarización de los niños y de los jóvenes discapacitados sea positiva sigue siendo estorbado por múltiples obstáculos en numerosos países. Todos los autores convergen para subrayar la importancia de la atención por el entorno socioeducativo que hace posible –o imposibilita– la realización del potencial de cada niño.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207