MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378071578 · doi:10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100145

Combustion behavior of single iron particles, Part II: A theoretical analysis based on a zero-dimensional model

2023· article· en· W4378071578 on OpenAlexafffund
Aki Fujinawa, Leon C. Thijs, Joel Jean-Philyppe, Aidin Panahi, Di Chang, Martin Schiemann, Yiannis A. Levendis, Jeffrey M. Bergthorson, XiaoCheng Mi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplications in Energy and Combustion Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilHorizon 2020European Research CouncilFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCanadian Space AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionNortheastern UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsDiffusionParticle (ecology)Arrhenius equationCombustionThermodynamicsChemistryPhase (matter)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceActivation energyPhysical chemistryChromatographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the ignition and solid-to-liquid phase transition of a fine (on the order of 10–100 µm in diameter) iron particle, the self-sustained combustion of a liquid-phase droplet of iron and its oxides takes place. The objective of the current work is to develop an interpretive and explanatory model for the liquid-phase combustion of a single fine iron particle. A zero-dimensional physicochemical model is developed assuming fast internal processes, such that the combustion rate is limited by the rate of external oxygen (O2) transport. The model considers a particle covered by a shell of liquid-phase FeO enclosing a core of liquid-phase Fe. Stefan flow and diffusion are considered for the gas-transport of O2, while the gas-transport of gas-phase Fe and FeO are calculated via diffusion only. The outward gas-phase Fe and FeO consume inward-transported O2 to stoichiometrically form hematite (Fe2O3), and the remaining oxygen that reaches the particle surface is entirely consumed to form liquid-phase FeO. The time history of simulated particle temperature shows consistent overprediction of the peak particle temperature when compared to experimental temperature measurements, indicating that the assumption of fast internal kinetics may be incorrect. The model is also unable to capture the apparent slow cooling rate observed in experiments. A further analysis is performed through a heuristic model with a calibrated reaction-rate law, where the internal diffusion of reactive Fe and O ions may become rate-limiting. The calibration of the pre-exponential factor in the Arrhenius term to match the experimental peak temperature yielded good agreement of time to peak temperature, as well as the slow cooling rate. The heuristic model considering internal diffusion predicts a plateau in peak temperature with increasing oxygen concentration. Possible uncertainties of the models, as well as future work, are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplications in Energy and Combustion ScienceSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207