MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Program Kemitraan Pengembangan Desa Wisata Di Desa Noepesu Kecamatan Miomaffo Barat Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara

2022· article· en· W4378085882 on OpenAlexaff
Yohanes Fritantus, Pionisius Minggu, Yoakim Rembu

Bibliographic record

VenueEmpowerment Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)TourismService (business)GeographySocioeconomicsAdministration (probate law)ManagementPolitical scienceBusinessSociologyMarketingArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noepesu Village is one of the villages located in the West Miomaffo District, North Central Timor Regency, and is one of the border villages bordering the South Central Timor district. Geographically, Noepesu Village still has a beautiful environment that makes this village very beautiful. The objectives of implementing community service activities include a). provide an understanding related to “tourism awareness” for village officials and administrators of BUMDES Noepesu, b). provide understanding and assistance to Village Apparatus and BUMDES Management regarding archive administration management, as well as social media as village promotion media based on customer satisfaction. In order to achieve the objectives listed above, the method of activity used is conducting field observations, carrying out counseling and mentoring with lecture and question and answer methods. The results of service activities are first, contacting partners and field observations, second, preparing tools and materials to carry out activities, and third, carrying out counseling and assistance to partner target groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmpowerment Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207