MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378175746 · doi:10.1117/12.2675459

Adverse drug reaction prediction and feature importance mining based on SIDER dataset

2023· article· en· W4378175746 on OpenAlexaff
Chun Liu, Mingzhe Huang, Xiang Cheng, lixian zhou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStackingAdaBoostSupport vector machineComputer scienceDrug reactionDrugAdverse drug reactionFeature (linguistics)Machine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningPharmacologyMedicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) refer to harmful and irrelevant reactions that occur when normal dosage drugs are used to prevent, diagnose, treat diseases or regulate physiological functions. This definition excludes reactions caused by intentional or accidental overdose and inappropriate medication. In this paper, several models were measured and compared. The results demonstrated that base learners such as LR, SVM, RF, Adaboost, XGBoost may perform exceptionally well in some specific situations. On the other hand, if the precision of the outputs is emphasized, applying Stacking or even Multi-layer Stacking will be the most efficient tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207