KORELASI FASILITAS BELAJAR BLENDED LEARNING DAN LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR BIOLOGI PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui korelasi antara fasilitas belajar pada pembelajaran Blended learning dan lingkungan keluarga dengan hasil belajar biologi pada masa pandemi Covid-19 di SMA Negeri 1 Kecamatan Lareh Sago Halaban. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif korelasional.. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa X IPA 1 sampai X IPA 5 yang berjumlah 177 orang siswa. Teknik pengambilan kelas sampel menggunakan teknik purposive random sampling dan teknik pengambilan sampel pada masing-masing kelas menggunakan teknik Stratified Random Sampling. Data dianalisa dengan menggunakan rumus korelasi Product Moment. Hasil uji signifikansi fasilitas belajar (x1) dengan hasil belajar (Y) diperoleh thitung =1,603 dan ttabel = 2,052 (thitung< ttabel) berarti fasilitas belajar tidak berkorelasi secara signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa (Y). Hasil uji signifikansi lingkungan keluarga (x2) diperoleh thitung= 2,259 dan ttabel = 2,052 (thitung>ttabel ) berarti lingkungan keluarga memiliki korelasi yang signifikan terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa. Selanjutnya korelasi ganda dengan uji-F diperoleh Fhitung=1,222 dan Ftabel=3,380 (Fhitung
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it