MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378188680 · doi:10.1039/d3tb00199g

Silver nanoparticles with exceptional near-infrared absorbance for photoenhanced antimicrobial applications

2023· article· en· W4378188680 on OpenAlexafffund
Connor R. Bourgonje, Daliane R. C. da Silva, Ella McIlroy, Nicholas D. Calvert, Adam J. Shuhendler, J. C. Scaiano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsAbsorbanceSilver nanoparticleNanoparticleMaterials scienceWavelengthNanotechnologyAntimicrobialInfraredParticle sizeParticle (ecology)PhotochemistryOptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryPhysicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we outline a simple method for synthesizing decahedral and triangular silver nanoparticles using light to tune particle shape and spectral characteristics. Notably, we were able to generate triangular silver nanoparticles with exceptional absorbance in the near-infrared (NIR) region, with high spectral overlap with the biological window, making them particularly promising for biological applications. We further demonstrate that under complementary LED illumination, these excitable plasmonic particles display exceptional antibacterial properties, several orders of magnitude more potent than similar particles under dark conditions or under illumination that does not match particle absorbance. This work demonstrates the powerful effects that LED lights can have on the antibacterial activity of AgNPs, providing an inexpensive and easily implemented route to unlocking the full potential of AgNPs in photobiological applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry BSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207