Fully-adaptive Model for Broadcasting with Universal Lists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In classical broadcasting, a piece of information must be transmitted to all entities of a network as quickly as possible, starting from a particular member. Since this problem has an enormous number of applications and is proven to be NP-Hard, several models are defined in the literature while trying to simulate real-world situations and relax several constraints. A well-known branch of broadcasting utilizes a universal list throughout the process. That is, once a vertex is informed, it must follow its corresponding list, regardless of the originator and the neighbor it received the message. The problem of broadcasting with universal lists could be categorized into two sub-models: non-adaptive and adaptive. In the latter model, a sender will skip the vertices on its list from which it has received the message, while those vertices will not be skipped in the first model.In this study, we will present another sub-model called fully adaptive. Not only does this model benefit from a significantly better space complexity compared to the classical model, but, as will be proved, it is faster than the two other sub-models. Since the suggested model fits real-world network architectures, we will design optimal broadcast algorithms for well-known interconnection networks such as trees, grids, and cube-connected cycles under the fully-adaptive model. We also present a tight upper bound for tori under the same model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".