Ensemble Method For Fault Detection & Classification in Transmission Lines Using ML
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Faults in a transmission line (TL) are the most common faults faced by almost every power station. Suppose these faults are not detected in time. In that case, they can result in multiple losses, such as a loss in an estimated power generation w.r.t predicted time and financial losses. In order to investigate the fault, the systematic approach of an engineer would be first to detect whether there is a fault or not. If a fault is detected in the transmission line, it should be classified as soon as possible. The following classifications would help the maintenance team identify the fault type: line fault, line-to-line fault, double line fault, triple line fault, single-line-to-ground fault, double line-to-ground fault, three-phase fault, and no fault. This paper proposes that the ensemble method, using the Machine Learning (ML) technique, will help the engineers detect and classify the faults in the transmission line. The investigation also trained and tested multiple ML classifiers to inform better recommendations. The shared research will help the user find the best possible ML results for predicting faults in the transmission line. Hence early and accurate fault detection will enhance safety and reliability and reduce interruption and downtime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".