GAS-LIQUID FILM DISTRIBUTION AND SEPARATION OF CONDENSATION FROM A DOWNWARD-FLOWING STEAM-NONCONDENSABLE GAS MIXTURE ONTO A HORIZONTAL TUBE AT SUBATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the boundary layer, a mathematical model was established to investigate the thicknesses of liquid and gas films and the steam condensate distribution in the presence of noncondensable gas outside a horizontal tube at pressures lower than atmospheric pressure. The model accurately predicts the steam condensation heat transfer with noncondensable gas. The influences of the noncondensable gas mass fraction, pressure, velocity, and surface subcooling upon the condensation heat transfer, the thicknesses of liquid and gas films, and condensate distribution around the horizontal tube have been studied. The liquid film thickness rises as the surface subcooling raises but reduces with raising pressure and mass fraction of noncondensable gas. The gas film thickness rises with rising surface subcooling and noncondensable gas mass fraction, reducing as the pressure rises. The thicknesses of gas and liquid films and condensate distribution significantly affect the local heat transfer. The liquid film separation velocity reduces with raising pressure, surface subcooling, and mass fraction of noncondensable gas, which is most influenced by pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".