Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On behalf of the IEEE and officers of the IEEE Systems Council, I would like to extend a warm and cordial welcome to our attendees at the 17 th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) -our first in-person gathering in 4 yearshere in this marvelous cosmopolitan city of Vancouver, BC Canada.You will be immersed in discussions involving systems engineering and complex systems with your peers and colleagues from industry, government, and academia, traveling to this marvelous country from all over the world.We hope that the technical program we have planned for you is what you were anticipating, as it does cover all aspects of complex systems and systems of systems and the highly specialized systems engineering skills that accompany such systems.Our Technical Program Chair, Dr. Sidney Givigi, of Queens University in Ontario Province, Canada, has put in countless hours of his valuable time to select the most appropriate content from the truly outstanding candidate material submitted for presentation this week, and I ask you to help me in thanking him for his invaluable efforts.To repeat that our ever-more complex world with its increasingly complex systems demands even greater attention to systems engineering may sound self-serving but it is totally true.Without a solid systems engineering foundation at the start, today's modern system complex systems will not meet expectations, let alone their budgets or schedules.And of course we are talking systems for all purposes, from medical to banking & financial to transportation; communications, and military.And even individual components or elements within systems have grown exceptionally complex, such as a single aircraft within the air transportation system.Look at the complexity of a single autonomous vehicle within the ground transportation system as another example.These are the things we will address, along with new approaches to systems engineering methodologies and tools.So please enjoy your visit and partake of the technical content that we offer you.We hope you enjoy not only this conference but your stay in Vancouver at this elegant and luxurious hotel, which also has a casino on property and where there are many sights to see (in the evenings, of course!).If there is anything we can do to make your visit more comfortable, please do not hesitate to contact one of our helpful staff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.658 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it