Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolution of ideas about the protection of the health of city residents is shown, starting with the emergence of the very science of urban planning in the last quarter of the 19th century. If in the works of its founder, Reinhard Baumeister, in relation to the health of citizens, the main attention was paid to their physical condition, namely sanitation and hygiene, then in the works of Camillo Sitte and Josef Stbben, who completed the formation of classical urban planning science, attention began to be paid not only to their physical, but and mental health and well-being. Ebenezer Howards idea of a garden city, which appeared as if in opposition to classical urban planning, actually turned out to be its development, as indicated by the successful implementation of the settlements of the Weimar Republic and Clarence Perrys neighborhood units, as examples of the integration of Howards ideas directly into the big city. Separately, the architecture of Swiss mountain resorts is considered, which is entirely subordinated to the promotion of health, and therefore had a direct impact on the entire architecture of the 20th century and its urban planning. In terms of time, this study is limited by the beginning of the global economic crisis of 1929 and the Great Depression, which resulted in radical changes in urban planning, due to which the issues of physical and mental health of city residents faded into the background.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".