MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378213976 · doi:10.32920/23159903.v1

Don’t Touch That: Enhancing the Post-COVID Interactive Theme Park Experience

2023· preprint· en· W4378213976 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Le

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractivityTheme parkNarrativeDistancingFeelingTheme (computing)Social distanceComputer scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Human–computer interactionStudioMultimediaSociologyInternet privacyPsychologyWorld Wide WebSocial psychologyTourismArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project identified functional performance requirements for supporting immersion and engagement while also promoting safe distancing and touchless interaction in the queue areas of attractions. Previous researchers identified that theme park queues must sustain guest engagement while also creating positive feelings towards wait times. Interactivity has been introduced within these spaces, however, pandemic control measures, like social distancing, conflict with many of these offerings. A solution is represented in this study by a prototype and implemented in a hypothetical themed attraction. By creating this element, guests will be able to stay six feet away from each other, while engaging in an immersive, themed narrative through motion sensors directed by Arduino. Experts favoured the prototype’s ability to encourage contactless engagement while social distancing while enhancing an engaging experience. The proposed prototype is a tangible example of an immersive, touchless interaction with a design approach that is feasible, appealing and merits further consideration and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207