MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378219828 · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2023.1153800

ModEx: a general purpose computer model exploration system

2023· article· en· W4378219828 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamid Younesy, Joseph Pober, Torsten Möller, Mohammad M. Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioinformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome British Columbia
KeywordsComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)WorkflowInterface (matter)Key (lock)Variety (cybernetics)Data miningMachine learningParameter spaceData explorationVisualizationArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionSoftware engineeringTheoretical computer scienceDatabaseOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a general purpose visual analysis system that can be used for exploring parameters of a variety of computer models. Our proposed system offers key components of a visual parameter analysis framework including parameter sampling, deriving output summaries, and an exploration interface. It also provides an API for rapid development of parameter space exploration solutions as well as the flexibility to support custom workflows for different application domains. We evaluate the effectiveness of our system by demonstrating it in three domains: data mining, machine learning and specific application in bioinformatics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in BioinformaticsSame topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207