MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4378226336 · doi:10.3390/jrfm16060282

Duration of the Membership in the GATT/WTO, Structural Economic Vulnerability and Trade Costs

2023· article· en· W4378226336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sèna Kimm Gnangnon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)Duration (music)EconomicsInternational economicsInternational tradeTrade barrierEconomic integrationWorld tradePanel dataEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper assesses the effects of the duration of membership in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/World Trade Organization (WTO) and structural economic vulnerability on trade costs in developing countries. The analysis is performed on an unbalanced panel dataset of 121 countries over the period 1996–2018 and primarily utilizes the two-step system generalized method of moments estimator. It has established several findings. We obtain that longstanding GATT/WTO members enjoy a larger reduction in trade costs than relatively new GATT/WTO members. Concomitantly, a higher degree of structural economic vulnerability leads to higher trade costs. Moreover, the membership duration exerts a higher trade costs reduction effect in countries that are highly “structurally” vulnerable, including those that face high levels of exposure to shocks and high magnitudes of shocks. Finally, longstanding GATT/WTO members that receive higher amounts of development aid (including total development aid flows, Aid for Trade flows, and NonAfT flows) enjoy a larger trade costs reduction than relatively new GATT/WTO members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial management→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→