MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4378231450 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.2023101224

How to explore for helium

2023· article· en· W4378231450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jon Gluyas, C. J. Ballentine, D. Danabalan, Colin G. Macpherson, Peter H. Barry, J. Bluett, T. Abraham-James

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeliumFossil fuelGeologyNatural gasNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Helium is a minor biproduct of some natural gas production in the USA, Qatar, Algeria, Canada, Australia and a couple more countries. Discovery of helium provinces has been serendipitous. A critical element for society, helium is used in medical cryogenics, as an inert atmosphere in manufacturing, a breathing mixture with oxygen, for leak detection and other industrial processes. Recently demand has outstripped supply and reliance on serendipity to deliver new discoveries is clearly inadequate. In 2012 we began to develop a strategy for helium exploration, borrowing from the petroleum exploration playbook to determine source of helium, primary and secondary migration processes and characteristics for trapping. An opportunity to test our strategy emerged in late 2015. From Lake Rukwa in Tanzania there were reports of cold helium seeps. The East African Rift, Archean granitic basement with a substantial and recent thermal event fitted our criteria for helium generation and migration. The gases proved to be nitrogen/helium mixtures free of petroleum gases and with maximum helium concentrations of around 10% some 30 times greater than the commercial threshold used in the USA. Exploration drilling in now underway in Tanzania whilst research continues to refine our understanding of natural helium systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→