MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Jean Kellens, Céline Redard. Introduction à l’Avesta : Le récitatif liturgique sacré des zoroastriens

2022· article· fr· W4378233558 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Ángel Andrés‐Toledo

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracta Iranica · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEurasian Exchange Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book serves as an introduction to the Avesta for a general public, but is at the same time conceived for specialists, insofar as it is also a compendium of the most recent studies and the changes experienced in the field in the last years. It is divided into the following chapters: 1) the formation of the Avestan philology, from the arrival of the first Avestan manuscript to Europe (1723) to the publication of Ch. Bartholomae’s Altiranisches Wörterbuch (1904); 2) the writing down of the ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracta IranicaSame topicEurasian Exchange NetworksFrench-language works237,207