Transcranial Doppler After Successful Endovascular Revascularization and Hospitalization Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Almost half of large-vessel occlusion strokes have unfavorable outcomes despite successful endovascular therapy. We aim to investigate whether postrevascularization cerebral hemodynamics, determined by transcranial Doppler (TCD), associate with hospitalization outcomes in this population. Methods: The current observational cohort study analyzed 155 patients with successfully revascularized anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke (mean age, 68.3±15.4 years; 55% women) who had TCD within 48 hours from endovascular therapy. TCD parameters (mean flow velocity, peak systolic velocity, and pulsatility index) were recorded at the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery, and blood flow signals were categorized using the Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia grades into normal (grade 5), stenotic (grade 4), or dampened (grade ≤3). Hospitalization outcomes comprised favorable discharge modified Rankin Scale score (0-2), favorable discharge destination (home or acute inpatient rehabilitation), and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score were fit to determine TCD findings in association with study outcomes. Results: Abnormal TCD-derived blood flow was found in 54 (35%) cases, including 35 (23%) with Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia grade 4 and 19 (12%) with Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia grade ≤3. Overall, 31% had favorable discharge modified Rankin Scale score, 65% had favorable destination, and 14% died. Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia grade ≤3 was associated with lower likelihood of both favorable discharge modified Rankin Scale score (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01-0.81]) and favorable destination (adjusted OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.07-0.71]). Mean flow velocity and peak systolic velocity were not associated with study outcomes. Conversely, increased pulsatility index was inversely associated with favorable destination (adjusted OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.13-0.87]). Conclusions: TCD after successful endovascular therapy identified abnormal blood flow in one-third of cases. Dampened flow and markers of increased microvascular resistance were associated with unfavorable hospitalization outcomes. TCD could provide valuable prognostic information in this population and identify potential therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".