"Technological Advancement Vs. High Rise Porn- Consumption Vs. Psychological Impacts"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bangladesh legalized Online internet on June 4th of 1996.Since then, in a slow & steady phase progression, the internet has become the universal source of information for people-in homes, at work and businesses in Bangladesh.This Tech-advancement particularly smartphones have increased the reach of the internet, thereby increasing the number of internet users.Overall, the government policies & efforts for digitized Bangladesh are eased by widespread increased of Internet access.It is obvious that these advancements and progression in usages have both positively and negatively contributed to the society in Bangladesh.Today, information can be accessed from the remote corners of the world for the benefits of an individual, business organizations, agencies etc., for the society.However, access to harmful materials such as pornography has become equally easy access where users sometime use it for its own satisfaction or gains.Sometime some companies use it for promoting its products or services in multi-faucets where scenarios in Bangladesh are no exception.Since porn-consumptions are linked to an increase in depressive and psychosomatic symptoms among adolescents, people here in Bangladesh are facing the dilemma in multi-faucets.Also, it has increased numbers of violence against women and girls in Bangladesh due to easy accessibility to pornography on the internet.Thus, these technological externalities can create market failures and violation of pareto efficiency.But the pecuniary externalities such as scenario of government policies restricting facilitations of porn consumption society-wise cannot.Besides having ongoing efforts for tech-usage progression, government efforts for correcting the tech-externalities in Bangladesh are urgently needed.Probable policies can be in three folds: a) Opening counselling services.b) Inspiring religious places delivering messages on consequences of pornconsumption here and hereafter c) Incorporating into academic curriculum for behavioral changes based on ethics, morality and consequences on own actions including porn-consumption and d) Tech-usage progression without having windows of creating externalities such as porn-consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".