MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378347793 · doi:10.17992/lbl.2023.06.747

Training of Icelandic rural doctors in managing trauma and acute illness

2023· article· en· W4378347793 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asta Evlalia Hrafnkelsdottir, Hjalti Már Björnsson, Jon Oskarsson, Steinthor Runolfsson

Bibliographic record

VenueLæknablaðið · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAttendanceTest (biology)Family medicineRural areaEconomic shortagePrimary careEmergency medical servicesQuarter (Canadian coin)Descriptive statisticsPopulationCapital cityMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthGovernment (linguistics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Rural medicine is in many ways different from urban primary care. In addition to providing primary care for a population, the rural doctor is tasked with the initial evaluation and stabilization of all emergencies usually managed by an Emergency Department in urban areas. The goal of this study was to assess rural doctors' in Iceland attendance of courses in Emergency Medicine (EM), how rural doctors grade their own ability to respond to emergencies and evaluate their Continuous Medical Education (CME) within the field of EM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, all rural general practitioners (GP) in Iceland with at least two years of experience post foundation training and who practiced at least a quarter of every year outside the capital area were surveyed using an electronic questionnaire. T-test and qi-square test were used for analysis and significance determined if p<0.05. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 84 doctors with 47 (56%) completing the survey. Over 90% of the participants reported having completed a course in Advanced Life Support (ALS) but only 18% had completed a course in prehospital EM specifically designed for this group of doctors. Over half of the participants considered themselves to have good training to perform 7 out of 11 surveyed emergency procedures. Over 40% of participants considered it necessary to improve their CME in 7 out of 10 categories of EM. The majority of rural GPs considered shortage of doctors in the rural environment a significant factor limiting their CME. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of rural doctors in Iceland consider themselves to have a good training to provide initial EM care in their community. Efforts to improve their training in this field of medicine should focus on scene safety and working in the prehospital setting, pediatrics, labor and deliveries and gynecological emergencies. Rural doctors need to have access to appropriate EM training courses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLæknablaðiðSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207