EVSE Effectiveness in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings Using Composite Optimization and Heuristic Search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effectiveness of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) is a very important factor in multi-unit residential buildings (MRBs) when planning to invest in an electric vehicle (EV). However, the expected benefits depend on not only technology but also need many non-functional requirements such as building facilities, electrical infrastructure, operating costs, and energy demand management of EVSE. We discuss the functional and non-functional constraints in utilizing EVSEs in MRBs and addresses them by constructing a composite optimization problem with a heuristic boundary selection. The proposed model urges the use of electrical safety codes –to mitigate the hazard risk– and promotes deploying a flexible and scalable energy management system (EMS) to schedule, reserve, and tune the charging sessions. This article provides an effective EMS for mitigating the energy demand growth caused by EV charging on MRBs, by finding the equilibrium number of EVSEs and their energy usage through a heuristic search. The proposed EMS is reinforced by embedding machine learning tools such as k-means, silhouette scoring, heuristic search, and autoregressive model to adjust the optimal operational state of EVSEs. We delineated the proposed framework and the outcomes using two case studies with real data. The results showed that more EVSEs can be utilized in MRBs and 100% EVs can be fully charged with a lower capital cost and no additional energy demand cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".