Bibliographic record
Abstract
The idea for this book germinated in the seeds of our 2012 report, Winning in a Changing World, co-authored with Thomas d'Aquino and Len Edwards, which was presented to the prime minister of Canada, each of Canada's premiers, and senior officials in the Government of Canada in June and August of that year.That report argued that Canada has to make a more serious and concerted effort to engage with the world's fast-growing emerging market economies to secure Canada's future.Our recommendations were based on a series of extensive consultations we had with business leaders and other experts across the country.We have developed and expanded those ideas in our analysis for this book.We have also developed a much larger canvas that addresses the broader foreign policy, security, and diplomatic challenges Canada confronts as the geopolitical tectonic plates of international relations shift with the rise of China and other regional and global centres of power and influence.Institutions that ensured stability and prosperity for much of the last half of the twentieth century are losing traction as well as relevance.They cry out for reform.Values that we assumed had world-wide resonance are being questioned.We explore the implications of these changes and of the "great awakening" taking place as peoples around the world become politically mobilized and struggle to define a new social and political order for themselves.Although we recognize that the United States will continue to be vitally important to Canada's future, we see the US increasingly turning inwards, weary of inconclusive yet costly military interventions and giving priority to its own internal economic and political
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.482 | 0.280 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".