MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4378385134 · doi:10.1515/9780773599581-002

Preface to the Third Edition

2016· book-chapter· en· W4378385134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I prepared the second edition of I Have Lived Here Since the World Began (2005) in the immediate aftermath of the landmark Regina v. Powley decision, which was the first Métis rights case to reach the Supreme Court of Canada.Although I had been involved at the trial level as an expert witness on behalf of the defendants, Steve and Rodney Powley, it was not yet clear to me in 2004 what the long-term impact of Powley would be for Canadian Aboriginal rights law generally and for the Métis in particular.Likewise, its implication for Native history was uncertain.In 2009, as we prepare the third edition, now titled An Illustrated History of Canada' s Native People, it is clear that one immediate and continuing effect has been a flood of rights claims by communities of mixed Aboriginal and European ancestry, making Métis rights litigation one of the most active and innovative areas of Aboriginal law in Canada since 2002.Claimants are from the vast and loosely defined domain of the historic Métis Nation, which reached from the upper Great Lakes, across the Prairies, to the Mackenzie River Valley and the Rocky Mountains.Claimants also are from lands beyond that vast territory that are not normally associated with the historic Métis.Jean Teillet, who was lead council for the Powley defendants, has continued to play a leading role in this ongoing litigation.She also is a role model and mentor to Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people who are involved in the field of Canadian Aboriginal rights.While pushing the boundaries of Aboriginal law, Powley also has stimulated a massive research effort that is altering our understanding of Native history.This is because the ruling raised fundamental historical and contemporary questions that arise from coast to coast: who is Métis in the eyes of Canadian law?Where and how did Métis communities emerge?What were their varied cultural and economic characteristics?What were the spatial parameters of these communities?How did they interact with their First Nations relatives and neighbours?Have historic Métis communities survived to the present day?What implications does Métis rights litigation have for our understanding of First Nations history in the post-contact era?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3870.235

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→