Bibliographic record
Abstract
This comparative conversation between specialists in English Canada and Quebec around the suggested theme of the interface of religious institutions and practices and the social order has incurred a number of debts.Nancy Christie launched our thinking in this direction during a stimulating evening of conversation in Montreal by suggesting the theme of "religion and social order" around which Protestant and Catholic historiographies might converge.As the project unfolded, participants had the opportunity to meet and discuss preliminary results of their research during a two-day symposium organized by Ollivier Hubert, "The Social Role of the Churches/Le rôle social des Églises," held at the Université de Montréal on 8-9 November 2002.The editors are grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council's Aid to Occasional Conferences and International Congresses in Canada Programme, whose funds assisted both the organization of the symposium and the publication of this volume, to the Département d'histoire, Université de Montréal, and to Isabel Ménard, who ably took charge of organizational matters during the conference.Yvonne M. Klein skillfully and efficiently translated the French-language contributions into English.We especially appreciate the keen interest and sound advice of Don Akenson, senior editor at McGill-Queen's University Press.From the inception of this project, Don urged us to consider ways in which to bring these findings to an international scholarly audience, and thus enhance the comparative dimension of the volume.Kyla Madden, editor at McGill-Queen's University Press, was always available to patiently answer our questions and to provide good advice while the manuscript was evaluated.We have
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.207 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".