MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4378436437 · doi:10.1515/9780228000464-001

Preface

2019· book-chapter· en· W4378436437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a story of me, of my Seawi Clan, and of my Wendat people.It is also a story of Canada and, as such, is an exploration into the historical and future significance of the Native soul of Canada in the world context.Most centrally, it presents our country, Canada, as our motherland, our Eatenonha, instead of as a common property we acquire and own by the fact of being and becoming Canadian.This book is also a gift, from me and from my people, to Canada and to the world.In the first chapter, I am inviting you, dear friend and reader, on a road trip in the eastern United States that I made with my very dear life-companion Bárbara in February 2012, where she and I converse, and at times surmise, about some less certain, sparsely documented aspects of my people's historical trajectory.This first section also takes you to Brazil and Argentina to give you a glimpse into my people's ancestral thinking about the continental unity of a Native American way of comprehending life and the world.In chapter 2, I take you back, through a tale of my unconventional family's life on our Reserve, to a time when Nature herself was so much more present than now in our ways of thinking and living.That piece is titled "Seawi: Hurons of the Rising Sun."Chapter 3 presents the virtually unknown history of the Seawi, a group of Wendat traditionally refractory to the socio-political order imposed by the colonial powers of New France.That section begins to explain how an ancient Aboriginal sense of Canada's viii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5950.379

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→