Bibliographic record
Abstract
I would like to thank the following organizations and individuals for their financial support of the publication of this book: the Visual Arts Section of the Canada Council for the Arts, the Beaverbrook Canadian Foundation, the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, the Heritage Foundation of Newfoundland and Labrador (hfNl), the Newfoundland Historic Trust, the Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Architects, Derrick and Linda Rowe, and David and Karen Hood.Several members of the Newfoundland Association of Architects, now called the Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Architects (NlAA), were extremely generous with their time, sharing their knowledge of architectural practice in Newfoundland in the early days of the association.Frank Noseworthy was particularly helpful, and his memory of buildings, people, and events is remarkable.The poignant insights he shared about the position of local architects in Newfoundland society, business, and politics close to the time of Newfoundland's union with Canada added much to my understanding of that period.Frank also permitted me to scan many original drawings in his collection.William MacCallum provided important information on construction details, especially on issues with locally fabricated bricks, and he supplied numerous suggestions for prospective contacts who were familiar with Newfoundland's modern architecture in the 1950s and 1960s.Brendan Murphy generously shared his experiences working on Fort Pepperrell in St John's in the 1940s and 1950s.Sir Christopher Barlow provided information on projects he was involved with in the 1960s.I would like to thank Memorial University of Newfoundland (MuN) professors Chris Sharpe and Jo Shawyer for permitting me to participate in their interviews with architect Paul Meschino when
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.229 | 0.069 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".