MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Capacitance Based Scanner for Thickness Mapping of Thin Dielectric Films

2002· article· en· W4378445068 on OpenAlexaff
John D. Graham, Zoran D. Popović

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical programs and proceedings/Technical program and proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsXerox (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricCapacitanceMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)Capacitance probeElectrical conductorRaster scanRaster graphicsOpticsThin filmImage resolutionScannerOptoelectronicsResolution (logic)Composite materialElectrodeNanotechnologyComputer scienceChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a technique capable of mapping variations in the thickness of thin dielectric films, such as organic photoreceptors. This technique is based on accurately recording the capacitance between a spherical probe and the conductive substrate of a dielectric film. Once the capacitance has been recorded, and assuming the dielectric constant is known, the thickness of the film can be readily extracted. In the current experimental configuration, the probe can be raster scanned with respect to the surface of the dielectric film, enabling one to record 3D images and observe any spatial variations in sample thickness. The spatial and thickness resolution of the technique is primarily dictated by the size of the probe. This technique is applicable to any dielectric film on a conductive substrate, assuming the dielectric constant is known.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnical programs and proceedings/Technical program and proceedingsSame topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207