NCG-TSM: A Noncooperative Game for the Taxi Sharing Model in Urban Road Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taxi sharing is a promising method to save resource consumption and alleviate traffic congestion while satisfying people’s commuting needs. Existing research methods include taxi dispatching methods based on intelligent algorithms, single vehicle route recommendation algorithms, and route recommendation algorithms based on vehicle traffic history. However, these studies either focus on how to efficiently dispatch satisfactory vehicles for passengers, ignoring the effect of efficient routes on vehicle travel efficiency, or let vehicles follow the shortest detour distance recommended by the system, ignoring the traffic congestion caused by the influx of vehicles into the same road. To address the abovementioned problems, a noncooperative game for a taxi sharing model (NCG-TSM) in urban road networks is proposed in this paper combined with the traffic conditions of the optional routes, and a distribution estimation algorithm for the shared taxi game is designed to make multivehicle route selections reach Nash equilibrium. The effectiveness of NCG-TSM is verified through simulation experiments. When the number of vehicles reaches the congestion capacity of the road segment, compared to the three common frameworks, the travel time cost and fuel consumption cost can be reduced by 5.8% to 9.1% and 3.5% to 8.9%, respectively. Besides, the occupancy rate has been improved, especially compared to the BMP framework, by 5.5% to 40%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".