The effects of chloride and sulphate on the growth of sulphide films on copper in anoxic sulphide solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The corrosion of copper in chloride‐ and sulphate‐containing solutions containing sulphide (ranging from 5 × 10−5 M to 10−3 M) was studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the structure and physical properties of the copper sulphide deposits (Cu2S) were analysed by scanning electron microscopy. At low [SH−], a porous and non‐protective deposit was formed, and the low corrosion rates were limited by sulphide transport, partially within the deposit and partially in the bulk of the solution. At higher [SH−], the corrosion rates were much higher and initially more rapid in chloride‐containing than in sulphate‐containing solutions, suggesting a direct role for chloride in the interfacial corrosion process. When the copper sulphide deposit thickened, the rate became limited by CuI transport within the more compact and more crystalline deposit formed. Changes in the morphology of the deposit suggest that chloride adsorption on the surfaces of the deposit inhibited the incorporation of Cu3S3 clusters, transported from the corroding copper surface, into the growing crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".