Weather influence on the performance of solar collector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A laboratory-scale evacuated tube solar collector (ETSCs) has been developed and tested for unloading conditions in Lanzhou, China. clear sky and cloudy conditions have been tested. Heat is generally considered instantaneous because it is a function of multiple instantaneous factors, like ambient temperature and solar radiation. The results show a clear sky day with a maximum and average value of ambient temperature, outlet, inlet, and solar radiation of 12 and -60C, 56 and 310C, 69 and 340C, 931 and 576W/m2, respectively, while a cloudy day was eight and -30C and 861.2 and 449W/m2 respectively. Clear sky day maximum and the average mass flow rate was 0.25 and 0.21 Kg/sec, while the cloudy flow rate was 0.27 and 0.03 Kg/sec, respectively. A clear sky has a heat loss of -0.307 and -0.05kW for a cloudy day. R square were 0.76 and 0.4 for clear sky and cloudy day, respectively. For the heat and radiation correlation relationship, a clear sky has a slope of 0.0029 and 0.0539 for a cloudy day. In other conditions, the solar radiation per unit area increases by 1 W/m2, and the daily heat is collected. Increasing A W/m2, the temperature difference between the average temperature of the hot water storage tank and the average temperature of the environment increases by one °C, and the daily heat collection decreases A W/m2. It concludes that a clear sky has much better efficiency than a cloudy day.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".