MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378549148 · doi:10.1080/02650487.2023.2215075

Luxury brands’ live streaming sales: the roles of streamer identity and level strategy

2023· article· en· W4378549148 on OpenAlex
Guoxin Li, Yue Cao, Bo Lu, Yunzhijun Yu, Honglei Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advertising · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdvertisingBusinessLive streamingIdentity (music)MarketingComputer scienceMultimediaAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, live streaming selling has grown and pioneered sales opportunities for luxury brands. Through a lens of influencer marketing and source credibility theory, this study investigates the role of streamer identity (i.e. internet celebrities and e-shop sellers) and streamer level (macro vs. micro) on luxury brands’ live streaming sales. Using fixed-effect models, the data from 7,164 live streaming campaigns between 1 August 2020 and 31 December 2020 are analyzed covering 17 international luxury brands on Taobao Live. The results suggest the use of a greater number of internet celebrities and e-shop sellers yields greater live streaming sales. Internet celebrities’ live streaming sales are positively associated with e-shop sellers’ live streaming sales. We further find that the streamer level moderates the effects of internet celebrity count and e-shop seller count on live streaming sales. These findings offer novel managerial implications for luxury brands’ streamer selection strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it