MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378605546 · doi:10.1353/cye.2005.0012

Gaining Ground

2005· article· en· W4378605546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Illène Pevec

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumNaturalizationPedagogyPopulationMulticulturalismSociologyEnvironmental educationStewardship (theology)Political sciencePublic relationsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 15 No. 2 (2005) ISSN: 1546-2250 Gaining Ground Dyment, Janet (2005). Canada: Evergreen; 52 pages. $free. ISBN 0973212497. Gaining Ground, written by Janet Dyment as part of her Ph.D. in Educational Studies, offers some excellent understanding of the school gardening movement’s triumphs and opportunities. The research for the monograph was done in 2003 in 45 elementary, middle and secondary schools in the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), Canada’s largest school district serving a population of 2.48 million people. 149 parents, teachers and principals took part in the study through a survey and/or interviews. The results outline the many benefits of greening school grounds as well as the challenges, including the need for on-going funding, garden maintenance, teacher support, professional development for outdoor teaching, and sufficient curriculum resources to fully develop the educational opportunities created by school grounds greening projects. 431 In light of my own experience with school gardens in three different countries, I can state that this study appears to have relevance to any school or district embarking on or already engaged in school naturalization projects. The research incorporated schools with diverse socio-economic status and multicultural populations. The findings remained consistent across this diverse mix of schools. They include: • The outdoor learning environment energized and inspired the teachers who used school naturalization or gardening projects for meeting curriculum goals. • Students showed more positive social behavior while playing and learning in “green” environments, which also translated into greater environmental awareness and stewardship. • The diverse play environments created by greening projects offered more creative and safer play spaces, and more social inclusion that engaged a broader range of students than traditional types of playgrounds. The recommendations coming from this study have broad implications for school districts beyond Toronto and Ontario. The benefits and challenges can be extrapolated to many educational settings. Gaining Ground recommends high level support of school greening through school boards and teacher education institutions in order that schools have these diverse environments as a matter of policy and teachers are trained in how to make use of the school grounds as outdoor classrooms. Further, greening projects should be funded at the school board level to ensure comprehensive master plans, long-term maintenance, and ongoing professional development for teachers. Equal access to these enriched school outdoor environments in poorer neighborhoods, where it may be more difficult for parents and staff to raise funds, depends on greening projects being embraced by the school boards as important for every school regardless of student socioeconomic status. 432 The data for this report came from questionnaires distributed to four populations at schools with greening projects: principals, teachers involved in the greening project, teachers NOT involved in the project, and parents involved in the project. The follow-up interviews happened at only five schools, chosen to represent a diverse range of socio-economic statuses. It would have been interesting to see survey results from students, but this was not part of the study. 00 percent of respondents reported that compared to indoor settings, outdoor classes increased student enthusiasm for learning. Additionally, the increased bio-diversity on school grounds enabled children to undertake science studies that in the past had only been possible on field trips. Further, teachers noted that art classes were much enriched by school gardens, as they gave students a wide array of natural life to sketch and observe. 77 percent of respondents stated that student ability to think creatively had increased due to outdoor learning on green school grounds. The interconnections between various disciplines was cited as a natural result of learning in natural habitats where students can observe specific populations of organisms in relation to each other, such as a bee pollinating a flower, or a worm at work in the compost. One teacher noted the difference in time awareness: “In the garden, though, time flows naturally so they learn naturally…they are not rushed. Learning just happens” (p. 22). A teacher and principal both commented on the fact that outdoor learning environments engage children kinesthetically offering students with that kind of orientation to learning a chance to shine. Another teacher noted “I see a real strong...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesFrench-language works237,207