MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611319 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0662

0662 Digital sleep-health surveillance: Population nightmare frequency is observable in social media

2023· article· en· W4378611319 on OpenAlexaff
Remington Mallett, Laura Sowin, Michelle Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNightmareDeclarationPopulationPsychiatrySocial mediaAnxietyPsychologyMental healthMedicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental healthLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Nightmares are a critical component of multidimensional sleep health. Frequent nightmare recallers suffer reduced sleep length, depressed mood, and are more likely to be diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder in the future. Reliable population estimates of nightmare frequency are difficult to obtain and often restricted to rigid timepoints (e.g., once per year). Thus, there is a need for low-cost methods to track population levels of nightmare frequency and their dynamic changes over time. In the current study, we tracked dream content and nightmare frequency using a popular new approach – digital health surveillance – that analyzes language of public and freely-accessible social media posts to track population characteristics. Methods To evaluate whether social media could detect known changes in population sleep health, we extracted posts from r/Dreaming, a popular subreddit dedicated to dream sharing. Prior survey studies have shown a reliable increase in nightmare frequency during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, we quantified the amount of nightmares posted on Reddit surrounding the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Nightmares were identified using a word-search algorithm that identified nightmare-related words in a post title. Nightmare frequency was compared before and after the WHO declaration using a chi-squared analysis. Results The percentage of dreams posted on Reddit that were identified as nightmares was higher after the WHO declaration than before (p < .05). Additionally, the amount of anxiety in all dreams posted on Reddit was higher after the WHO declaration than before (p < .05). Weekly change in dream anxiety was positively correlated with the percentage of COVID-19 news headlines (p < .05). Conclusion We observed an increase in nightmares shared on Reddit immediately following the WHO’s declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. This novel approach to tracking nightmares might offer the field of sleep medicine a low-cost and real-time system for monitoring population sleep health. Other recent work suggests this method might be viable for tracking other components of sleep health. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207