MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611363 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0530

0530 Efficacy of obstructive sleep apnea treatment by a unique oral appliance and effect of concurrent myofunctional and CPAP therapy

2023· article· en· W4378611363 on OpenAlexaff
David Lee-Heidenreich, Seth Heckman, Clete A. Kushida

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineObstructive sleep apneaContinuous positive airway pressureAirwayOral applianceApneaAnesthesiaHypopneaPolysomnographyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Current treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) include positive airway pressure, oral appliances, and upper airway surgery. The Day and Night Appliance (DNA) is a component of a dentist-guided system (Complete Airway Repositioning and Expansion [CARE], Vivos Therapeutics) that leads to gradual increases in upper airway volume. This study examines the effects of DNA treatment on OSA in patients before and after use of the device; we also examined how DNA treatment was impacted by concurrent myofunctional and CPAP therapy. Methods Data from a prospectively-collected clinical database (Vivos Airway Intelligence Service [AIS]) were reviewed, and 94 adult OSA patients who met DNA use criteria and had pre- and post-treatment sleep studies without the device in place were included. We compared the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) pre- and post-treatment using a paired t-test and fit linear regression models with change in AHI and ODI as dependent variables. Results Mean patient age was 47.8±14.7 years and 44.7% were men. Pre- and post-treatment sleep studies were conducted 15.2±7.0 months apart. 24.5% of patients were treated with DNA and myofunctional therapy (14.1% exclusively myofunctional, 10.4% myofunctional plus another treatment, e.g., tonsillectomy, frenectomy). 17.0% of patients were treated with CPAP (12.8% exclusively CPAP, 4.2% CPAP plus another treatment). For both pre-treatment and post-treatment, mean AHIs were 22.3±19.4 and 12.7±11.2 respectively (p< 0.0001) and mean ODIs were 11.6±13.7 and 7.8±9.1 respectively (p< 0.0001). Excluding patients who had undergone myofunctional therapy and another treatment modality and adjusting for patient age, BMI, and gender, we found myofunctional therapy was associated with a -10.4 change in AHI (p=0.038). However, myofunctional therapy was not associated with a significant change in ODI (p=0.905). Concurrent CPAP use did not have a significant association with change in either AHI (p=0.47) or ODI (p=0.61). Conclusion This study shows that DNA use significantly improved post-treatment OSA severity, and that concurrent myofunctional but not CPAP therapy may result in further OSA improvement. An oral appliance system that provides palatal expansion with consequent improvement in OSA severity but does not require permanent nightly use has advantages over conventional oral appliances; however, further investigation is warranted. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207