Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Indirect Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesteraemia in a Paediatric/Parent Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Familial hypercholesteraemia (FH), an inherited disorder of cholesterol metabolism, has a prevalence of 1:250 and an associated 6- to 22-fold increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Despite the prevalence and availability of effective risk-reduction treatments, 90% of at-risk Canadians are undiagnosed. Indirect cascade screening from an index case is useful but the uptake is low (<4%), suggesting that barriers may exist. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, we sought to determine barriers and facilitators among parents of children diagnosed with FH that may influence the uptake of cascade screening among families. Methods: A qualitative description approach was used for virtual interviews with 10 parents of children with FH, recruited from a regional Lipid Clinic in Toronto, Canada. Semistructured interviews were conducted. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis method. Results: Five interconnecting themes were identified that captured both facilitators and barriers of indirect cascade screening: a high level of knowledge about FH after clinic attendance; parents' surprise of their child's diagnosis and ongoing worry; parents' willingness to communicate the need for cholesterol screening; parents' desire for educational materials, dictated by an external vs internal locus of control; and social and societal influences including the lack of awareness about FH in professional and public domains. Conclusions: The themes identified will inform next steps in programme development. An urgent need was identified for strategies to educate the public and primary care providers about FH and blood cholesterol/genetic screening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".