MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Targeting adrenergic receptors to activate brown fat without cardiovascular effects

2023· article· en· W4378648727 on OpenAlexaff
L Dumont, Alexandre Caron, Gabriel Richard, Étienne Croteau, Mélanie Fortin, Frédérique Frisch, Serge Phoenix, Stéphanie Dubreuil, Brigitte Guérin, Éric Turcotte, André C. Carpentier, Denis P. Blondin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMirabegronBisoprololBrown adipose tissueInternal medicineEndocrinologyThermogenesisWhite adipose tissueMedicineAntagonistAdipose tissuePharmacologyReceptorChemistryBlood pressureOveractive bladder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We previously revealed that oral administration of the β3-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist mirabegron only elicited small increases in brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis when ingested at the maximal allowable dose (200 mg). This led to off-target binding of the β1- and β2-AR, thereby increasing cardiovascular responses and white adipose tissue lipolysis, respectively. We hypothesize that a balanced activation between β1- and β3-AR is key to stimulating metabolic benefits without cardiovascular side effects. Method: We performed a randomized crossover trial in 8 lean men over two study days. The intervention consisted of oral administration of mirabegron (200 mg) with or without the cardio selective β1-AR antagonist bisoprolol (10 mg). Dynamic [11C]-acetate and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT scans were performed sequentially starting at 210 min after oral administration of mirabegron ± bisoprolol. Results: Compared to baselines measures, mirabegron alone or with bisoprolol increased energy expenditure (EE) by 27% (+18.2±6.7 kcal/h) and 11% (7.4±8.1 kcal/h), respectively. However, EE was significantly lower when mirabegron was co-ingested with bisoprolol (P=0.0402) Compared to room temperature, mirabegron alone increased BAT oxidative metabolism (0.631±0.267 vs 1.695±1.097 min-1 from the [11C]-acetate, P=0.0421), but was not different from mirabegron with bisoprolol (1.273±0.651 min-1). Metabolic rate of glucose in BAT, measured using [18F]FDG PET, was significantly higher with mirabegron than mirabegron combined with bisoprolol (24±10 vs 16±8 nmol/g/min, P=0.0284). Mirabegron also increased systolic blood pressure (+5±5 vs -6±10 mmHg, P=0.0252) and heart rate (6±7 vs -5±6 beats·min-1, P=0.0081) relative to baseline levels, which was prevented with bisoprolol. The glycerolipid-fatty acid cycling was not different between mirabegron without or with bisoprolol treatment (total cycling: 118.1±346.9 vs 168.5±439.5 μmol·min-1, P=0.8023). Conclusion: The administration of a β1-AR antagonist decreases the adverse cardiovascular effects of mirabegron. However, at the provided dose, it also restricts the stimulating effects of mirabegron on the thermogenesis. Public foundation grants This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207