Arterial baroreflex control of heart rate in young and older adults and in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The arterial baroreflex (ABR) plays an important role in evoking appropriate cardiovascular adjustments in response to perturbations such as exercise. The ABR control of heart rate (HR) becomes attenuated with advancing age and in a variety of patient populations, but limited information is available in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The present study tested the hypothesis that the ABR control of HR is attenuated to a greater extent in patients with HFpEF compared to older and young controls. Methods: Six patients with HFpEF (71±6 years; 35.3±6.6 kg/m2), 4 older controls (68±4 years; 25.1±3.4 kg/m2), and 7 young controls (27±4 years; 26.6±3.9 kg/m2) underwent sequential bolus infusions of sodium nitroprusside (50-100 μg) and phenylephrine (150 μg) (modified Oxford technique) to provoke acute hypotension (“BP falls”) and hypertension (“BP rises”), respectively. Cardiac baroreflex gain was quantified as the weighted linear regression slope between the R-R interval and systolic blood pressure (BP). Results: Compared to young controls (10.7±3.4 ms/mmHg), overall cardiac baroreflex gain was reduced in older controls (3.4±1.6 ms/mmHg) and patients with HFpEF (2.1±1.8 ms/mmHg) (p<0.05), with no difference between the older controls and patients with HFpEF (p=0.718). During BP falls, cardiac baroreflex gain was not different between groups (p=0.06), but was qualitatively lower in patients with HFpEF (0.6±1.5 ms/mmHg) compared to young (5.3±5.5 ms/mmHg) and older controls (5.2±1.9 ms/mmHg). During BP rises, cardiac baroreflex gain was not different between older controls (2.6±0.8 ms/mmHg) and patients with HFpEF (2.3±2.0 ms/mmHg) (p>0.05); however, responses in patients with HFpEF were attenuated compared to young controls 10.7±5.8 ms/mmHg) (p<0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggest an age-related attenuation in the overall ARB control of HR that does not appear to be further exacerbated in patients with HFpEF. However, patients with HFpEF may exhibit a selective attenuation in ABR-mediated tachycardia in response to acute reductions in BP that may pose an increased risk of hypotension and frank syncope. This work was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (RX001311, to D.W.W.; IK2RX003670, to K.B.). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".