MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex-specific differences in the circulatory response to postural stress among young adults with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)

2023· article· en· W4378649476 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathan Iannarelli, Terrance J. Wade, Kylie S. Dempster, Deborah D. O’Leary

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupine positionHeart rateMedicineBlood pressureBody mass indexMean arterial pressureYoung adultAdverse Childhood ExperiencesInternal medicinePhysiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)—a highly prevalent assortment of traumatic childhood events (e.g., abuse)—are strongly linked to adult cardiovascular disease (CVD), though differently among males and females. Biological sex differences in the circulatory response to physiological stress (e.g., postural stress) have been well-characterized; however, whether ACEs affect this response differently among males and females remains unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that ACEs affect the circulatory response to head-up tilt (HUT; postural stress) differently among males and females. Three hundred ( n = 156 female; 22.4 ± 1.8 years) young adults recruited through the Niagara Longitudinal Heart Study (NLHS) were included in the current analyses. ACEs were assessed (Childhood Trust Events Survey 2.0) and participants were dichotomized into high (≥4 ACEs) and low (<4 ACEs) exposure groups. Beat-by-beat mean arterial pressure (MAP; finger photoplethysmography) and heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram) were recorded during 10-minutes of supine rest and 5-minutes of 60° HUT. Sex-stratified, mixed-model regression analyses assessed the effect of ACEs on changes (Δ) in MAP and HR from supine rest to HUT, adjusting for age, body mass index, physical activity, and smoking status. During HUT, MAP increased to a similar extent in males with high and low ACEs exposure (ΔMAP: 11.5 ± 10.8 mmHg vs. 10.1 ± 10.9 mmHg, respectively; p > 0.05). In contrast, MAP increased to a greater extent in females with high ACEs exposure compared to females with low ACEs exposure (ΔMAP: 11.3 ± 10.4 mmHg vs. 5.9 ± 9.8 mmHg, respectively; p = 0.003). HR increased during HUT in males with both high and low ACEs exposure; however, it increased to a lesser extent in males with high ACEs exposure compared to males with low ACEs exposure (ΔHR: 14.7 ± 7.5 bpm vs. 18.7 ± 8.1 bpm, respectively; p = 0.015). In females, HR increased to a similar extent during HUT in those with high and low ACEs exposure (ΔHR: 16.5 ± 8.1 bpm vs. 17.6 ± 8.9 bpm, respectively; p > 0.05). These data suggest that ACEs affect the circulatory response to postural stress differently in males and females. Further, these data imply that sex-specific differences in circulatory regulation can be observed as early as young adulthood in those reporting high ACEs exposure. This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) and Brock University This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207