MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selective alpha 1-adrenergic blockade attenuates resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in healthy young men

2023· article· en· W4378649919 on OpenAlexaff
Lauro C. Vianna, Gustavo Rodrigues, Maurício Daher, André L. Teixeira, Igor A. Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrazosinBlood pressureMedicineSupine positionPhenylephrineInternal medicineHeart rateHemodynamicsMean blood pressureAnesthesiaCardiologyAntagonistReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events and end-organ damage. However, its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. For instance, alterations in beat-to-beat blood pressure variability are thought to be driven by changes in both the reflex control of the autonomic nervous system and peripheral vascular function. To determine the role of peripheral sympathetic vasoconstriction on the beat-to-beat blood pressure variability, beat-to-beat heart rate (HR, by electrocardiography) and blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) were continuously measured in seven healthy men (22 ± 5 yr) at rest (supine position), with and without (Control) a systemic and selective blockade of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors through the oral administration of Prazosin (1 mg/20 kg of body weight). Stroke volume was estimated from the blood pressure waveform (ModelFlow), permitting the calculation of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance. Two hours post-Prazosin ingestion, blood pressure responses to intravenous bolus infusion of phenylephrine were robustly reduced (-80 ± 15%, P = 0.001), indicating a significant functional blockade of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. However, all resting hemodynamic variables were unchanged after the oral ingestion of Prazosin. Compared with control, Prazosin significantly reduced the standard deviation of systolic (5.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 mmHg, P = 0.004), diastolic (3.3 ± 1.0 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 mmHg, P = 0.05), and mean blood pressure (3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5 mmHg, P = 0.02), as well as cardiac output (652 ± 251 vs. 428 ± 78 mL/min, P = 0.02) and total peripheral resistance (1.1 ± 0.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 mmHg/L/min, P = 0.03). Similar results were found using different indices of blood pressure variability. Altogether, these findings suggest that peripheral sympathetic vasoconstriction plays a pivotal role in modulating resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in healthy young men. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; grant: 307293/2019-0 and 431740/2018-6). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207