MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378673716 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0513

0513 Assessing precision oral appliance efficacy using frequency- and risk-based indices

2023· article· en· W4378673716 on OpenAlexaff
Erin Mosca, Joshua Grosse, Seyed Abdolali Zareian Jahromi, John E. Remmers

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstructive sleep apneaApnea–hypopnea indexSleep apneaOral applianceClinical PracticeApneaInternal medicinePolysomnographyAnesthesiaPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), a frequency-based index commonly used to define the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), fails to capture the risk related to OSA. Sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden (SASHB) appears to be more predictive of OSA-related risk than AHI but has only been studied in cohorts of untreated individuals. This is the first assessment of the ability of precision oral appliance therapy (OAT) to reduce SASHB and the use of SASHB, rather than AHI, to define therapeutic efficacy. Methods Data previously obtained from a clinical study investigating prediction of response to precision OAT in OSA were analyzed. Study participants with OSA (n = 11 mild, n = 19 moderate, and n = 18 severe) completed two-night level 3 home sleep tests before and after receiving a precision oral appliance (ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA). Apnea-hypopnea index and SASHB were calculated. For SASHB, a cut-off of 53 %min/h was selected based on data suggesting that values above this limit are associated with OSA-related risk; for AHI, cut-offs of < 10 h-1 and < 15 h-1 were selected due to their widespread use in clinical practice. Results Precision oral appliance therapy reduced AHI from 31.6 ± 19.2 h-1 to 11.7 ± 15.8 h-1 (p < 0.001) and SASHB from 83.2 ± 63.6 %min/h to 25.2 ± 42.3 %min/h (p < 0.001). Using an AHI-based definition of therapeutic efficacy, 83% (for AHI < 15 h-1) and 71% (for AHI < 10 h-1) of participants achieved efficacy with precision OAT. However, when the risk-based SASHB definition of therapeutic efficacy (SASHB < 53 %min/h) was used, precision OAT efficacy increased to 90%. Conclusion In the population studied, precision OAT significantly improved SASHB. The use of AHI, a frequency-based index of OSA, appears to misclassify some individuals as therapeutic non-responders to precision OAT despite their having an SASHB in the low-risk range. Sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden likely provides a more meaningful assessment of OSA treatment efficacy as it accounts for the risk associated with the disease. Support (if any) This work was supported by ProSomnus Sleep Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207