Hypocapnia increases heart rate in patients with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is characterized by chronic orthostatic intolerance and significantly impacts quality of life of patients. POTS predominantly affects women of child-bearing age with an estimated prevalence of up to 1%. POTS is defined by an excessive increase in heart rate (HR) of ≥30 bpm within 10 minutes of upright posture, in the absence of orthostatic hypotension. POTS is associated with chronic symptoms (≥6 months) including hyperventilation (HV) in the form of hyperpnea. HV reduces arterial CO 2 (hypocapnia) and worsens tachycardia in POTS. Whether it is hypocapnia that increases HR in these patients is unclear. Studies have not investigated the effects of CO 2 on HR due to the confounding effects of posture and ventilation. Objective: We aimed to determine if hypocapnia exacerbates tachycardia in POTS patients. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that hypocapnia will increase HR in POTS. Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover trial of hypocapnic HV vs. eucapnic HV in 13 female POTS patients (34±9 y). Participants completed the supine breathing protocol: 1) HV with resultant hypocapnia, and 2) HV (with end-tidal CO 2 (ETCO 2 ) clamped at baseline). Breath-by-breath respiratory (ventilation (V E ), tidal volume (V T ), ETCO 2 , end-tidal O 2 (ETO 2 )) and beat-to-beat hemodynamics (HR, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO)) were measured. Data are reported as mean±SD. Paired t-tests were used to compare respiratory and hemodynamic parameters between hypocapnic HV vs. eucapnic HV. Results: During HV, ETCO 2 was significantly lower during hypocapnia vs. eucapnia (19.6±3.7 mmHg vs. 37.4±3.5 mmHg; p<0.0001). ETO 2 was greater during hypocapnia vs eucapnia (117.4±4.7 mmHg vs. 114.6±3.1 mmHg; p<0.001). There was no difference in V E (22.2±6.5 L/min vs. 22.0±5.1 L/min; p=0.8) or V T (1.4±0.4 L vs. 1.4±0.3 L; p=0.9) between hypocapnia and eucapnia. HR was significantly greater during hypocapnia vs. eucapnia (99±12 bpm vs 82±10 bpm; p<0.001); SV was significantly lower during hypocapnia vs. eucapnia (66±14 mL vs. 74±13 mL; p=0.02); and there was no difference in CO between hypocapnia and eucapnia (6.4±1.3 L/min vs. 6.1±1.6 L/min; p=0.3). Conclusion: Independent of ventilation, hypocapnia increases HR in patients with POTS. Our findings suggests that hypocapnia causes a reduction in SV, perhaps due to increased blood pooling in the capacitance vessels leading to reduced venous return. This work was supported by Standing up to POTS. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".