Isometric Force-Frequency and Dynamic Power-Frequency Relationships in Human Knee Extensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under voluntary control the neuromuscular system grades contractile output of recruited motor units by modulating discharge frequency. Electrically evoked (i.e., involuntary) contractions have been used to assess relationships between frequency input and contractile output. During an isometric contraction (i.e., no joint rotation) it is well-established that the force-frequency relationship is sigmoidal. However, there are few data describing the relationship between evoked input and dynamic (i.e., joint rotation) contractile parameters. Thus, the purpose was to examine the relationships between stimulated frequencies and dynamic power (i.e., product of concentric torque and angular velocity) during an isotonic contraction in comparison to an isometric force-frequency relationship. Knee extensors of 7 healthy young adult males were tested in a Cybex dynamometer. The right knee was at 90° and hip at 110°. Seat belts secured to the dynamometer were strapped across the hips and shoulders, and a non-elastic strap was secured across the thigh to avoid extraneous movement. Two stimulation electrodes, which consisted of aluminum wrapped in a conductive gel-soaked cloth were secured transversely to the proximal and distal portion of the knee extensors. For dynamic contractions the dynamometer was set to the “isotonic mode” and range of motion was 60°. The muscles were stimulated at 1, 5, 7.5, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 75 and 100 Hz. Besides the 1 Hz (i.e., single pulse) all frequencies during isometric contractions were 2s in duration. During isotonic contractions with the load set to 7.5% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), pulses were programmed to terminate once range of motion was complete or until full range of motion was unachievable. Electrical current for all frequencies was determined from that required at 100 Hz to produce 50% isometric MVC force. Stimulation was done in ascending order with 20s rest between. The order between contraction modes was randomized and a 5-minute rest was given between modes. Results are presented as a percentage of relative peak force or peak power for 100 Hz during isometric or isotonic contractions, respectively. Both isometric force-frequency and dynamic power-frequency relationships were sigmoidal. During stimulation of increasing frequencies peak power was lower than isometric force by ~82%, ~47%, ~43%, ~38%, ~32%, ~25%, ~30%, ~23%, ~17%, ~12%, ~8% at ascending frequencies from 1 Hz to 40Hz, respectively. From 50 Hz to 100 Hz there were minimal differences (0-4%). These data indicate for the same stimulation frequencies the power-frequency relationship of a moderately loaded isotonic contraction is shifted rightward relative to an isometric force-frequency relationship. Therefore, isometric force-frequency and dynamic power-frequency relationships are not equivalent, and assessments of both relationships may be required to adequately characterize contractile function depending on the task. Supported by NSERC. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".