Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter introduces Shipping in Inuit Nunangat: Governance Challenges and Approaches in Canadian Arctic Waters. The volume intends to offer timely reflection on governance issues related to shipping in Canadian Arctic waters at a time of tremendous physical and ecological changes due to warming temperatures, a shifting legal environment prompted among others by the Polar Code, and a new sense of agency that motivates Inuit to play an active part in shaping the future of their homeland, Inuit Nunangat. The Introduction describes the geographical focus of the book before turning to the main governance concerns that emerge from the following chapters. Prominent among them is the challenge for Canadian policy-makers to plot a path out of Canada’s colonial past, which still undermines relationships between Inuit and the Crown, including with respect to shipping regulations. Another key concern is related to the fragile Arctic ecosystem and the need to make efficient protection against vessel-source disturbances a priority to minimize additional stressors as much as possible. These concerns need further to be squared with considerations related to the region’s economic development and issues of sovereignty, safety, security and military defence. The last part of the Introduction provides an overview of the chapters that follow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.292 | 0.104 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".