MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378676681 · doi:10.1109/icstw58534.2023.00069

Test Cost Reduction for 5G and Beyond using Machine Learning

2023· article· en· W4378676681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)University of OttawaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Test (biology)Computer scienceCost reductionMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software testing is essential, but expensive, especially for significant issues, feature-rich systems such as telecommunication systems evolving toward 5G and beyond. There is a need in this domain for effective testing techniques to ensure that a minimal number of test cases assess the most important combinations of system functions with respect to domain-specific criteria.Our approach aims to address this challenge by first automatically mapping existing test cases to the combinations of system capabilities they exercise and visualizing the mappings using decision tree learners. Then, the approach uses a combination of the engineers’ feedback (domain-specific criteria), mapping data, and test execution logs to propose new test cases covering newly-added capabilities or better exercising/verifying existing ones while ensuring the efficacy at fault detection, code coverage, equipment cost, test execution time, redundancy avoidance, among other things.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it