MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378695902 · doi:10.5114/dr.2023.127664

Inverse psoriasis in a patient with a historyof subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

2023· article· en· W4378695902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Izabela Staniszewska, Agnieszka Kalińska‐Bienias

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniwersytet WarszawskiWarszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny
KeywordsPsoriasisMedicineDermatologySubacute cutaneous lupus erythematosusCutaneous Lupus ErythematosusLupus erythematosusSystemic lupus erythematosusPathologyAutoimmune diseaseImmunologyConnective tissue diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Inverse psoriasis is a rare variant of psoriasis.The clinical presentation consists of well-demarcated erythematous lesions, which most often occur in flexural and intertriginous areas.Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a form of lupus that is characterized by typical skin lesions, UV hypersensitivity and the presence of anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies.The coexistence of psoriasis and lupus erythematosus is reported sporadically.Case report: A 49-year-old woman with a history of SCLE, who developed inverse psoriasis, initially on the anterior surface of the neck, and then within the elbow flexures.The diagnosis of this form of psoriasis was based on the clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological examinations.Conclusions: The coexistence of SCLE and psoriasis is rare.The localization of psoriasis in the anterior region of the neck and elbow flexures, was a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology ReviewSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207