Pengaruh Modal Intelektual Dan Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Modal Intelektual, Pendapatan Islami, Pembiayaan Bagi Hasil, dan Zakat Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia yang terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) tahun 2012 sampai dengan tahun 2016 yang secara keseluruhan berjumlah 13 bank. Bank yang dijadikan sampel dalam penelitian ini diambil dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Berdasarkan metode tersebut, didapatkan jumlah bank yang memenuhi kriteria pemilihan sebanyak 7 bank. Data dianalisis dengan teknik analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Modal Intelektual berpanguh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia; (2) Pendapatan Islami tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia; (3) Pembiayaan Bagi Hasil tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia; (4) Zakat berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".