MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peran Organisasi Perempuan dalam Ruang Perkotaan

2023· article· ms· W4378699178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penataan Ruang · 2023
Typearticle
Languagems
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saat ini keberadaan ruang publik perkotaan di Indonesia mengalami tekanan pembangunan yang sedemikian pesat, hal ini berdampak terhadap kuantitas ruang publik yang terus mengalami penyusutan baik dari segi jumlah maupun luasan. Penciptaan ruang publik di permukiman padat penduduk seperti kampung kota dapat dilakukan melalui dukungan dan peran dari organisasi komunitas yang berpihak pada keadilan dan inklusivitas ruang kota. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, dengan mencoba mengeksplorasi peran kepemimpinan perempuan dalam penciptaan ruang komunal di kampung kota di Jakarta Selatan. Temuan dari penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa pemimpin perempuan menaruh perhatian besar pada isu-isu terkait kesehatan, lingkungan, dan juga akses ruang publik bagi warga kampung kota yang termarjinalkan. Selain itu dengan didukung keberadaan komunitas dan kolegialitas warga yang solid, maka kehadiran ruang publik demi peningkatan kualitas lingkungan binaan yang mereka tinggali dapat tercapai.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it