Peran Organisasi Perempuan dalam Ruang Perkotaan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saat ini keberadaan ruang publik perkotaan di Indonesia mengalami tekanan pembangunan yang sedemikian pesat, hal ini berdampak terhadap kuantitas ruang publik yang terus mengalami penyusutan baik dari segi jumlah maupun luasan. Penciptaan ruang publik di permukiman padat penduduk seperti kampung kota dapat dilakukan melalui dukungan dan peran dari organisasi komunitas yang berpihak pada keadilan dan inklusivitas ruang kota. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, dengan mencoba mengeksplorasi peran kepemimpinan perempuan dalam penciptaan ruang komunal di kampung kota di Jakarta Selatan. Temuan dari penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa pemimpin perempuan menaruh perhatian besar pada isu-isu terkait kesehatan, lingkungan, dan juga akses ruang publik bagi warga kampung kota yang termarjinalkan. Selain itu dengan didukung keberadaan komunitas dan kolegialitas warga yang solid, maka kehadiran ruang publik demi peningkatan kualitas lingkungan binaan yang mereka tinggali dapat tercapai.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".