MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378745101 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1190058

Corrigendum: Comparing copromicroscopy to intestinal scraping to monitor red fox intestinal helminths with zoonotic and veterinary importance

2023· erratum· en· W4378745101 on OpenAlexaff
Erica Marchiori, Federica Obber, Roberto Celva, Federica Marcer, Patrizia Danesi, Anna Maurizio, Lucia Cenni, Alessandro Massolo, Carlo Vittorio Citterio, Rudi Cassini

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInsects and Parasite Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeterinary medicineHelminthsBiologyZoologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the published article, there was an error regarding the affiliation for Lucia Cenni. As well as having affiliation [3], she should also have [Applied Ecology Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento] and [Conservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento].The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicInsects and Parasite InteractionsFrench-language works237,207