Point cloud completion in challenging indoor scenarios with human motion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combining and completing point cloud data from two or more sensors with arbitrarily relative perspectives in a dynamic, cluttered, and complex environment is challenging, especially when the two sensors have significant perspective differences while the large overlap ratio and feature-rich scene cannot be guaranteed. We create a novel approach targeting this challenging scenario by registering two camera captures in a time series with unknown perspectives and human movements to easily use our system in a real-life scene. In our approach, we first reduce the six unknowns of 3D point cloud completion to three by aligning the ground planes found by our previous perspective-independent 3D ground plane estimation algorithm. Subsequently, we use a histogram-based approach to identify and extract all the humans from each frame generating a three-dimensional (3D) human walking sequence in a time series. To enhance accuracy and performance, we convert 3D human walking sequences to lines by calculating the center of mass (CoM) point of each human body and connecting them. Finally, we match the walking paths in different data trials by minimizing the Fréchet distance between two walking paths and using 2D iterative closest point (ICP) to find the remaining three unknowns in the overall transformation matrix for the final alignment. Using this approach, we can successfully register the corresponding walking path of the human between the two cameras' captures and estimate the transformation matrix between the two sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".