MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378760116 · doi:10.1002/mma.9436

Inertial algorithms with adaptive stepsizes for split variational inclusion problems and their applications to signal recovery problem

2023· article· en· W4378760116 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Zhou, Bing Tan, Songxiao Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHilbert spaceInertial frame of referenceBounded functionConvergence (economics)AlgorithmNorm (philosophy)Contraction (grammar)Signal recoveryApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisCompressed sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the help of the Meir–Keeler contraction method and the Mann‐type method, two adaptive inertial iterative schemes are introduced for finding solutions of the split variational inclusion problem in Hilbert spaces. The strong convergence of the suggested algorithms is guaranteed by a new stepsize criterion that does not require calculation of the bounded linear operator norm. Some numerical experiments and applications in signal recovery problems are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesSame topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207